Posts

Showing posts from October, 2016
Auroa A. Sales Vs. Benjamin D. Adapon, et al. G.R. No. 171420. October 5, 2016 1.     AURORA, a US immigrant who has resided in said country since 1980, filed a complaint charging RESPONDENTS with the crime of use of falsified documents under Article 172, par. 3 of the Revised Penal Code. And since AURORA was in USA, she authorized Jerico B. Sales, her son-in-law, for the purpose of instituting the criminal proceedings against petitioners. Notwithstanding that the totality of the evidence presented already established probable cause to indict the respondents for the violation of Article 172, paragraph 3, of the Revised Penal Code, Prosecutor Cuevas dismissed the instant complaint on the ground that it was impossible for him to proceed with the preliminary investigation without the appearance of AURORA who will be subjected to some clarificatory questions on certain matters. Explain the nature and purposes of the preliminary investigation. A preliminar...
Sps. Emilio and Alicia Jacinto Vs. Atty. Emelie P. Bangot, Jr. A.C. No. 8494. October 5, 2016 The spouses averred that a private survey team had conducted a survey and tried to enter the premises the spouses owned. They consulted ATTY. BANGOT, JR. on the legal remedies to prevent the intrusion on their property. Atty. Bangot, Jr. told them that he would initiate a case for certiorari in exchange of one of their lots. It appears that soon after the respondent unilaterally prepared the document so-called Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), to wit: MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: I, ATTY. EMELIE P. BANGOT, JR., of legal age, married and a resident of Lot 13, Block 1, Xavier Heights Subd., Upper Balulang, Cagayan de Oro City, hereinafter referred as the FIRST PARTY; and WE, SPOUSES EMILIO JACINTO AND ALICIA JACINTO, both legal age, and residents of Cagayan de Oro City, herein referred as the SECOND PARTY; WITNESSETH: 1.    ...