Ben Line Agencies Philippines, Inc. Vs. Charles M.C. Madson and Alfredo P. Amorado
Ben Line Agencies Philippines, Inc. Vs. Charles M.C.
Madson and Alfredo P. Amorado
G.R. No. 195887. January 10, 2018
G.R. No. 195887. January 10, 2018
Ben Line
initially failed to submit clear and legible copies of the resolutions of the
OCP when it filed its petition for review before the DOJ. In its motion, Ben
Line had already attached clear and legible copies of the resolutions appealed
from. Under Section 6 of the 2000 NPS rules, failure to comply with the
requirements of Section 5 constitutes sufficient ground to dismiss the
petition.
Is it
proper to dismiss the case outright on the ground of procedural lapses only?
No. In
Air Philippines Corporation v. Zamora (Air Philippines), the Court elucidated
that mere failure to attach legible copies does not ipso facto warrant the
dismissal of a complaint or a petition.
A petition
dismissed earlier, due to lack of an essential pleading or part of the case
record, may still be given due course or reinstated upon showing that
petitioner had later submitted the documents required, i.e., when such
documents required are part of a subsequent motion for reconsideration.
Comments
Post a Comment